Category: Health

  • Trichomonas Vaginalis – new data shows worryingly high positivity rates across England

    Trichomonas Vaginalis – new data shows worryingly high positivity rates across England

    New data analysis from Preventx shows Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) positivity rates are disproportionately high amongst some Racially Minoritized Communities and deprived communities, across England.

    TV causes the condition called trichomoniasis, where women experience painful urination (dysuria), vulval itching and discomfort, vaginal discharge, and offensive odor. If left untreated, the infection can cause complications in pregnant women, including low birth weight and early birth. Those infected with TV are also more likely to acquire HIV infection after exposure. Men with trichomoniasis can experience painful urination or urethral discharge; it is usually a milder, more transient infection than in women.

    The new data analysis from remote sexual health testing provider Preventx, shows a 5.2% positivity rate in women from Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African background who were experiencing vaginal discharge – an established symptom of TV. This is significantly higher than the 3.4% positivity rate recorded in white British women and 3.5% positivity rate across all women. TV also disproportionately affects asymptomatic women from Black, Black British, Caribbean, or African background, with a positivity rate more than twice that of asymptomatic white British women (2% vs 0.8%).

    For the first time, the researchers also looked at the relationship between TV positivity rates and levels of deprivation. The team also looked at TV rates with the lowest IMD quintiles – a measure of relative deprivation for fixed geographic areas of the UK. They found that the lowest quintile had higher levels of TV than other communities, with a 5.9% TV positivity rate in symptomatic women. This is significantly higher than the 1.4% seen in the least deprived quintile. People without any symptoms from the most deprive quintiles are also three times more likely to test positive for TV than other asymptomatic groups (2.7% vs 0.8%).

    We’ve always known that TV was a common infection in London, but our new data shows worryingly high positivity rates elsewhere across England, with certain communities more affected than others.

    To address this problem, we are calling for more data to be collected about TV across the UK to help us understand more about regional prevalence and for areas with high positivity rates to use Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests – which can be carried out by symptomatic and asymptomatic women and have been shown to have the highest accuracy rates – to screen service users for the infection. These tests can be carried out remotely using Preventx testing kits and will allow us to address the consequences of undiagnosed TV and reduce transmission. This also aligns with the newly released British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) Guideline for the Management of Trichomonas vaginalis, which calls for improved testing.

    TV can usually be treated with antibiotics but increasing rates of treatment failure make it important for testing to be performed after treatment. This can be done easily by online testing too. Testing and treating sexual partners is also vital to prevent reinfection. Online testing offers an easy way for this to be achieved, especially for those who might not want to attend a clinic.

    Dr John White, Medical Director at Preventx and Consultant Physician in Sexual Health and HIV working in the Western and Northern Health & Social Care Trusts, Northern Ireland.

    High-quality TV testing is not yet carried out as standard in England and other parts of the UK, but it is known to be far more common than gonorrhoea (NG) globally, which is routinely tested for. The study team compared the two infections and found that 3.5% of women with symptoms tested positive with TV compared to only 0.6% for gonorrhoea, underlining the need for more high-quality testing for TV.

    The new analysis was carried out by Preventx, the largest provider of remote sexual health testing in the UK and presented at the BASHH Annual Conference. The study team conducted a retrospective analysis of data gathered from remote STI tests of 8,676 women from six English local authority areas, providing new insight into TV.

    Remote testing from Preventx offers an accurate and easy way to diagnose TV in asymptomatic and symptomatic women – using Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) that are far more sensitive than the tests usually offered in clinics, with no additional requirements for patients. This also improves access for more people. These high-quality NAATs are not currently used as standard in sexual health clinics. Once diagnosed, TV can usually be easily treated with antibiotics.

    Preventx works in partnership with over 70 NHS local authorities to provide safe and convenient remote STI tests. Since launching, Preventx has issued over 4 million tests kits to people across the UK, which equates to 10 million individual tests.

    “With conventional testing TV can go undiagnosed, and it’s important we find new ways to help people who could be carrying this infection. Working with Preventx, we used a symptomatic triage pathway to support women with mild symptoms of an STI to test at home, including TV NAAT testing. This allowed us to effectively diagnose and support women with TV. Remote testing fast and convenient for people and it has freed up capacity in our clinics to see the people that need to be seen.”

    “Since working with Preventx to provide remote NAAT testing for people with symptoms, we have seen a surprisingly higher percentage of people diagnosed with TV. This has allowed us to diagnose and treat more women in Kent.

    “Without this high-quality testing, reservoirs of TV infection will remain undiagnosed.”

    Dr Lesley Navaratne, Clinical Director for Integrated Sexual Health Services, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, and member of the team behind the study.

  • Monkeypox – Multi-Country Outbreak – Situation Update – June 17 2022

    Monkeypox – Multi-Country Outbreak – Situation Update – June 17 2022

    Since January 1st 2022, cases of monkeypox have been reported to The World Health Organization (WHO) from 42 Member States across five WHO regions (the Regions of the Americas, Africa, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, and Western Pacific).

    As of June 15, a total of 2103 laboratory confirmed cases and one probable case, including one death, have been reported to WHO. The outbreak of monkeypox continues to primarily affect men who have sex with men who have reported recent sex with new or multiple partners.

    While epidemiological investigations are ongoing, most reported cases in the recent outbreak have presented through sexual health or other health services in primary or secondary health care facilities, with a history of travel primarily to countries in Europe, and North America or other countries rather than to countries where the virus was not historically known to be present, and increasingly, recent travel locally or no travel at all.

    Confirmation of one case of monkeypox, in a country, is considered an outbreak. The unexpected appearance of monkeypox in several regions in the initial absence of epidemiological links to areas that have historically reported monkeypox, suggests that there may have been undetected transmission for some time.

    WHO assesses the risk at the global level as moderate considering this is the first time that many monkeypox cases and clusters are reported concurrently in many countries in widely disparate WHO geographical areas, balanced against the fact that mortality has remained low in the current outbreak.

    Description of the outbreak

    Between 1 January to 15 June 2022, a cumulative total of 2103 laboratory confirmed cases, one probable case, and one death have been reported to WHO from 42 countries in five WHO Regions. The majority of cases (98%) have been reported since May 2022.

    The majority (84%) of confirmed cases (n=1773) are from the WHO European Region. Confirmed cases have also been reported from the African Region (n=64; 3%), the Region of the Americas (n=245; 12%), Eastern Mediterranean Region (n=14; <1%) and Western Pacific Region (n=7; <1%). Of cases reported (468 out 2103 confirmed cases) from 14 countries for which demographic information and personal characteristics are available, 99% are reported in men aged 0 to 65 years (Interquartile range: 32 to 43 years; median age 37 years), of which most self-identify as men who have sex with other men.

    The case count is fluctuating as more information becomes available and data are verified under the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005).

    To date, the clinical presentation of monkeypox cases associated with this outbreak has been variable. Many cases in this outbreak are not presenting with the classically described clinical picture for monkeypox (fever, swollen lymph nodes, followed by a centrifugal evolving rash). Atypical features described include: presentation of only a few or even just a single lesion; lesions that begin in the genital or perineal/perianal area and do not spread further; lesions appearing at different (asynchronous) stages of development; and the appearance of lesions before the onset of fever, malaise and other constitutional symptoms. The modes of transmission during sexual contact remain unknown; while it is known that close physical and intimate skin-to-skin or face-to-face contact can lead to transmission (through direct contact with infectious skin or lesions), it is not clear what role sexual bodily fluids, such as semen and vaginal fluids, play in the transmission of monkeypox.

    Public health response
    WHO continues to support sharing of information. Clinical and public health incident response has been activated by Member states to coordinate comprehensive case finding, contact tracing, laboratory investigation, clinical management and isolation and implementation of infection and prevention and control measures.

    Genomic sequencing of viral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), where available, is being undertaken. Several European countries (Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Australia, Canada, Nigeria, Singapore and the United States of America have published full-length or partial genome sequences of the monkeypox virus found in the current outbreak. While investigations are ongoing, preliminary data from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays indicate that the monkeypox virus genes detected belong to the West African clade.

    The ACAM-2000 and MVA-BN vaccines are being deployed by some Member States to manage close contacts. Others may hold supplies of LC16 or other vaccines.

    Interim guidance is being or has been developed to support Member States with raising awareness; surveillance, case investigation and contact tracing; laboratory diagnostics and testing; clinical management and infection prevention and control (IPC); vaccines and immunization; and risk communication and community engagement (please refer to the WHO Guidance and Public Health Recommendations section below).

    WHO risk assessment
    Currently, the public health risk at the global level is assessed as moderate considering this is the first time that monkeypox cases and clusters are reported concurrently in many countries in widely disparate WHO geographical areas, balanced against the fact that mortality has remained low in the current outbreak.

    In apparently newly affected countries, cases have mainly, but not exclusively, been confirmed amongst men who self-identify as men who have sex with men, participating in extended sexual networks. Person to person transmission is ongoing, still primarily occurring in one demographic and social group. It is likely that the actual number of cases remains an underestimate. This may in part be due to the lack of early clinical recognition of an infectious disease previously thought to occur mostly in West and Central Africa, a non-severe clinical presentation for most cases, limited surveillance, and a lack of widely available diagnostics. While efforts are underway to address these gaps, it is important to remain vigilant for monkeypox in all population groups to prevent onward transmission.

    At present, transmission in apparently newly affected countries is primarily linked to recent sexual contacts. There is the high likelihood that further cases will be found without identified chains of transmission, including potentially in other population groups. Given the number of countries across several WHO regions reporting cases of monkeypox, it is highly likely that other countries will identify cases and there will be further spread of the virus. Human-to-human transmission occurs through close or direct physical contact (face-to-face, skin-to-skin, mouth-to-mouth, mouth-to-skin) with infectious lesions or mucocutaneous ulcers including during sexual activity, respiratory droplets (and possibly short-range aerosols), or contact with contaminated materials (e.g., linens, bedding, electronics, clothing, sex toys).

    The current risk for the general public remains low. There is a risk to health workers if they are in contact with a case while not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent transmission; though not yet reported in this current outbreak, the risk of health care-associated infections has been documented in the past. Should monkeypox begin to spread more widely to and within more vulnerable groups, there is the potential for greater health ­­­impact as the risk of severe disease and mortality is recognized to be higher in immunocompromised individuals, including persons with poorly controlled HIV infection. While infection with monkeypox during pregnancy is not fully understood, limited data suggest that infection may lead to adverse outcomes for the foetus or newborn infant and for the mother.

    To date, all cases identified in newly affected countries whose samples were confirmed by PCR have been identified as being infected with the West African clade. There are two known clades of monkeypox virus, one first identified in West Africa (WA) and one in the Congo Basin (CB) region. The WA clade has in the past been associated with an overall lower case fatality ratio (CFR) of <1% while the CB clade appears to more frequently cause severe disease with a CFR previously reported of up to about 10%; both estimates are based on infections among a generally younger population in the African setting. In the period following the eradication of smallpox, more people were immune to orthopoxviruses through exposure to smallpox or receipt of smallpox vaccine. Therefore, initially most early cases of human monkeypox were among children who were vulnerable and therefore at risk of more severe disease.

    Vaccination against smallpox was shown in the past to be cross-protective against monkeypox. Today, any continuing immunity from prior smallpox vaccination would in most cases only be present in persons over the age of 42 to 50 years or older, depending on the country, since smallpox vaccination programmes ended worldwide in 1980 after the eradication of smallpox. Protection for those who were vaccinated may have waned over time. The original (first generation) smallpox vaccines from the eradication programme are no longer available to the general public.

    Smallpox and monkeypox vaccines, where available, are being deployed in a few countries to manage close contacts. Second- and third-generation smallpox vaccines have been developed to have an improved safety profile and one has been approved for prevention of monkeypox. This vaccine is based on a strain of vaccinia virus (known generically as modified vaccinia Ankara Bavarian Nordic strain, or MVA-BN). This vaccine has been approved for prevention of monkeypox in Canada and the United States of America. In the European Union, this vaccine has been approved for prevention of smallpox under exceptional circumstances. An antiviral agent, tecovirimat, has been approved by the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada, and the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of smallpox. It is also approved in the European Union for treatment of monkeypox. WHO has convened experts to review the latest data on smallpox and monkeypox vaccines, and to provide guidance on how and in what circumstances they can be used.

    WHO advice
    The advice provided hereafter by the WHO on actions required to respond to the multi-country monkeypox outbreak, is based on its technical work, and informed by consultations with the following existing WHO advisory bodies: the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH); the ad-hoc Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) working group on smallpox and monkeypox vaccines; the Emergencies Social Science Technical Working Group; the Advisory Committee on Variola Virus Research; WHO Research & Development (R&D) Blueprint consultation: Monkeypox research; the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO); as well as by the outcome of ad-hoc meetings of experts.

    All countries should be on the alert for signals related to patients presenting with a rash that progresses in sequential stages – macules, papules, vesicles, pustules, scabs, at the same stage of development over all affected areas of the body – that may be associated with fever, enlarged lymph nodes, back pain, and muscle aches. During this current outbreak, many individuals are presenting with atypical symptoms, which includes a localized rash that may present as little as one lesion. The appearance of lesions may be asynchronous and persons may have primarily or exclusively peri-genital and/or peri-anal distribution associated with local, painful swollen lymph nodes. Some patients may also present with sexually transmitted infections and should be tested and treated appropriately. These individuals may present to various community and health care settings including but not limited to primary and secondary care, fever clinics, sexual health services, infectious disease units, obstetrics and gynaecology, emergency departments and dermatology clinics.

    Increasing awareness among potentially affected communities, as well as health care providers and laboratory workers, is essential for identifying and preventing further cases and effective management of the current outbreak.

    Any individual meeting the definition for a suspected case should be offered testing. The decision to test should be based on both clinical and epidemiological factors, linked to an assessment of the likelihood of infection. Due to the range of conditions that cause skin rashes and because clinical presentation may more often be atypical in this outbreak, it can be challenging to differentiate monkeypox solely based on the clinical presentation.

    Caring for patients with suspected or confirmed monkeypox requires early recognition through screening adapted to local settings, prompt isolation and rapid implementation of appropriate IPC measures (standard and transmission-based precautions, including the addition of respirator use for health workers caring for patients with suspected/confirmed monkeypox, and an emphasis on safe handling of linen and management of the environment), physical examination of patient, testing to confirm diagnosis, symptomatic management of patients with mild or uncomplicated monkeypox and monitoring for and treatment of complications and life-threatening conditions such as progression of skin lesions, secondary bacterial infection of skin lesions, ocular lesions, and rarely, severe dehydration, severe pneumonia or sepsis. Patients with less severe monkeypox who isolate at home require careful assessment of the ability to safely isolate and maintain required IPC precautions in their home to prevent transmission to other household and community members.

    Precautions (isolation) should remain in place until lesions have crusted, scabs have fallen off and a fresh layer of skin has formed underneath.

    Information should reach those who need it most during upcoming small and large gatherings, particularly among social and sexual networks where there may be close, frequent or prolonged physical or sexual contact, particularly if this involves more than one partner. All efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary stigmatization of individuals and communities potentially affected by monkeypox.

    WHO

    WHO is closely monitoring the situation and supporting international coordination working with its Member States and partners.

    This is a developing story.

  • Countries recommit to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030

    Countries recommit to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030

    At the 2022 World Health Assembly, countries recommitted to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030.

    Since the initial historic commitment in 2016, the Sustainable Development Goals 2020 target of reducing the prevalence of hepatitis B in children under 5 years to under 1% has been met globally and in most WHO regions. In addition, the number of people receiving treatment for hepatitis C has increased 10-fold to more than 10 million.

    However, globally more than 350 million people are still living with this life-threatening disease. The gains made have been uneven across the world, with those most impacted often least likely to benefit, and most countries have failed to meet the GHSS 2020 targets. Few babies have access to the hepatitis B birth dose vaccine in many low- and middle-income countries, with less than 10% in Africa receiving a timely vaccine. Additionally, infection and prevention control in health care settings needs further improvements and harm reduction remains insufficiently scaled up and accessible. Stigma and discrimination continue to be a barrier to testing and care. Only 10% and 21% of people know that they live with chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C respectively, even fewer receive treatment, and liver cancer related to hepatitis is on an exponential rise especially in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, acute hepatitis A and E continue to impact people’s health all over the world.

    The participants of the third World Hepatitis Summit believe that the new Global Health Sector Strategies (GHSS) on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2022-2030, provides an opportunity to refocus global efforts, accelerate the response and recommit to the elimination of viral hepatitis by 2030.

    To make the elimination of hepatitis a reality within evolving health systems, we call on countries, global partners and other stakeholders, to act now to achieve the 2025 and 2030 targets by developing and implementing national hepatitis strategies which address the five strategic directions of the GHSS and put people living with viral hepatitis at the heart of the response.

    We ask that multisectoral action, which recognises civil society as an integral partner, is taken to operationalise hepatitis programmes which promote integration, decentralisation and task shifting to improve access.

    We call on governments, global health agencies and donors to honour commitments already made and further commit to prioritise and fund comprehensive hepatitis programmes so that everyone, everywhere, has access to affordable prevention, testing, treatment and care.

    We also call on the 350 million people living with viral hepatitis and their communities to unite, amplify their voices and take their place in the hepatitis response.

    Hepatitis Can’t Wait!

    The World Health Organization (WHO)
  • Is now the right time for doctors to start prescribing vibrators?

    Is now the right time for doctors to start prescribing vibrators?

    That’s one of the research questions being posed by a team of Cedars-Sinai doctors addressing female sexual dysfunction, an issue that affects around 40% of women of reproductive age worldwide.

    Dr. Alexandra Dubinskaya, a urogynecology fellow, is leading this new study at Cedars-Sinai to determine if vibrators can help women who are suffering from sexual dysfunction, urinary frequency or urgency, overactive bladder, incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse.

    “We know we need to exercise all parts of our bodies, and we all hear we shouldn’t skip ‘leg day,’ but we regularly skip ‘pelvic floor day. Exercising the pelvic floor muscles could be challenging, and that’s why vibrators could be a really good modality to actually massage the muscles and increase the blood flow in the area.”

    Dr. Alexandra Dubinskaya

    Women in the study are interviewed about their sexual, pelvic floor and overall health. They complete a validated questionnaire on their symptoms and undergo a pelvic exam. Participants are given a vibrator and instructed to use it three times a week for three months. Afterwards, women discuss their experience, complete exit questionnaires and undergo another pelvic exam.

    The study aims to evaluate the effect of regular vibrator use on subjective symptoms and wellness, and make an objective assessment of tissue quality and organ prolapse.

    The concept tested in the study is already in clinical use for men. Men who have had surgery for prostate cancer, for example, are routinely prescribed erectile dysfunction medications. The resulting blood flow allows the tissue to stretch and maintain its functionality.

    “In the same way the increased blood flow from an erectile dysfunction pill helps men heal following their cancer surgery, using a vibrator might help women.”

    Dr. Karyn Eilber, urologist and sexual health expert at Cedars-Sinai

    The team of doctors from Cedars-Sinai refer to a lack of studies, tools and recommendations to help women with the conditions that fall under the catch-all diagnosis that can include pelvic pain, pain during sex, arousal difficulties, orgasmic disorders and other symptoms that can take a toll on quality of life and relationships.

    “We have studies looking at the diagnosis and management of sexual dysfunction, but there isn’t really much data on the patient perspective, healthcare perception or what kind of treatments are working. There’s a huge gap in medical literature on what we can do for these patients, and we need a better understanding of what the general public knows to help treat these patients in the future.

    It’s a widespread problem that affects thousands of women. Despite the prevalence of urogynecologists, pelvic medicine doctors and sexual medicine doctors, there’s actually a really small number of people who know how to treat these disorders.”

    Dr. Poone Shoureshi, a urogynecology fellow at Cedars-Sinai


    Part of the teams’ goal is to increase conversations around sexual health. The team is awaere of the taboo and squeamishness around women’s sexual wellness and pleasure.

    “It’s an important topic,” says Dr. Eilber. “Doctors need to be actively involved in removing the stigma. We need to take sexual health and mental health as seriously as physical health.”